YES 0.635
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
mainModule Main
| ((zip3 :: [b] -> [a] -> [c] -> [(b,a,c)]) :: [b] -> [a] -> [c] -> [(b,a,c)]) |
module Main where
Lambda Reductions:
The following Lambda expression
\abc→(a,b,c)
is transformed to
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((zip3 :: [a] -> [c] -> [b] -> [(a,c,b)]) :: [a] -> [c] -> [b] -> [(a,c,b)]) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((zip3 :: [c] -> [a] -> [b] -> [(c,a,b)]) :: [c] -> [a] -> [b] -> [(c,a,b)]) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (zip3 :: [c] -> [a] -> [b] -> [(c,a,b)]) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_zipWith3(:(wv30, wv31), :(wv40, wv41), :(wv50, wv51), ba, bb, bc) → new_zipWith3(wv31, wv41, wv51, ba, bb, bc)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_zipWith3(:(wv30, wv31), :(wv40, wv41), :(wv50, wv51), ba, bb, bc) → new_zipWith3(wv31, wv41, wv51, ba, bb, bc)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 3 > 3, 4 >= 4, 5 >= 5, 6 >= 6